 LTC Bullet: Using Medicaid to Protect Inheritances Friday, June 25, 2021 Seattle-- LTC Comment: As long as Medicaid diverts over $7 trillion from private long-term care responsibility, how can we expect consumers to plan responsibly for that huge risk and cost? Details follow the ***news.*** *** PUBLICATIONS: Long-term care has reached a crucial crossroads. Will it follow the current course into increased dependency on government deficit spending and eventual collapse? Or will consumers take back responsibility and redirect long-term care toward the kind and venues of care they prefer? It all depends on public policy decisions about to be made in 50 state capitols and in Washington, DC. We need to raise our voices in opposition to compulsory, payroll-funded entitlement approaches that will doom long-term care consumers to outcomes even worse than under Medicaid. We should explore, propose, and support solutions that avoid relying on government and engage the public to save, invest, insure and pay privately for the long-term care they prefer in the settings they desire. Steve Moses and the Center for Long-Term Care reform are doing our part with articles aimed at a wide audience, including the column featured today in The Hill and these: “President Biden, tear down this wall,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s LTC News, June 24, 2021 “LTC financing: Be careful what you WISH for,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s Senior Living, June 7, 2021. “Government Violates the Long Term Care Social Contract to Your Detriment, by Stephen A. Moses, Broker World, June 2021 “The social contract for long-term care,” by Stephen Moses, McKnight’s Long-Term Care News, May 17, 2021. “Why LTCI Fails,” by Stephen A. Moses, Broker World, March 2021. “Nursing Homes, Coronavirus and Medicaid,” by Stephen A. Moses and Brian C. Blase, Wall Street Journal, June 1, 2020 We urge you to read these articles and forward them to your friends, family and colleagues. Add your comments whenever the publisher invites readers to “Join the Discussion.” *** ***
JOIN THE CENTER: Want to be part of our “LTC Resistance?” Review the
Center’s “Membership
Benefits and Levels,” choose a plan that’s best for you, and
join the Center for Long-Term Care Reform. We’ll fight together for
rational long-term care public policy that rewards responsible planning
and discourages the Medicaid-induced complacency that results in public
welfare dependency. Receive our
LTC Bullets, LTC E-Alerts, and at the premium membership
level, our LTC Clippings. Get and remain on the cutting edge of
professional expertise by taking full advantage of the Center’s
Members-Only website and our wide-open public website,
www.centerltc.com. *** LTC BULLET: USING MEDICAID TO PROTECT INHERITANCES LTC Comment: The following column was first published by The Hill on June 10, 2021. “Using Medicaid to Protect
Inheritances” The number of Americans over 65 increases by about 4,000 each day, causing the finances of many government programs to become more precarious. While Social Security and Medicare receive the most attention, a growing concern is the reliance on Medicaid to pay the nation’s long-term care needs. Medicaid pays nearly half the nation’s long-term care bills, and improper payments in the program exceed $100 billion a year. Conventional wisdom is wrong that seniors need to spend down to gain Medicaid eligibility for long-term care. Seniors can make a sizable income (medical and long-term care costs are deducted before determining eligibility) and hold large assets and still qualify for Medicaid. These assets include home equity of $603,000 in most states ($906,000 in nine states) and generally unlimited amounts in retirement accounts. With minimal prior planning, child heirs can preserve their inheritance by arranging their parents’ finances and assets so that Medicaid picks up the tab in the event long-term care services are necessary. A cottage legal industry has emerged to assist heirs in creating such wealth management schemes. The ease with which people can gain Medicaid eligibility for long-term care creates a major moral hazard problem. Since the government is paying, people don’t need to properly plan. A prominent economic study found that Medicaid largely crowds out the market for private long-term care insurance. While gaining access to Medicaid long-term care is too easy, one aspect of law in this area that makes sense is now under threat. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 required states to recover long-term care costs borne by the Medicaid program from the estates of deceased recipients. The primary asset in most estates is the home, and U.S. seniors hold $7 trillion of home equity. This law sends the message that Medicaid would pay long-term care bills, but the tab, or at least a portion of it, would be paid out of the deceased person’s estate. It was essentially a government-backed loan for people who failed to prepare to pay privately for long-term care. It isn’t welfare if it’s paid back. For many reasons, it would be better to limit eligibility to Medicaid long-term care on the front end, but the existence of Medicaid estate recovery efforts avoids some amount of moral hazard. Unfortunately, a powerful Medicaid advisory board is recommending that Congress eliminate the requirement for states to pursue estate recoveries. This board, the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC), says the fear of estate recovery discourages people from applying for Medicaid, and recovery efforts tend to keep poor people poor. But MACPAC’s rationale makes no sense. States cannot recover funds expended on behalf of people who lack assets. Estate recoveries only affect people who have resources left over and generally died without a spouse. MACPAC also claims that estate recoveries do not produce a lot of revenue. That’s true, but fixable. After the 1993 federal requirement for estate recoveries, states did not implement robust recovery programs, the federal government did not enforce the law and the media didn’t publicize the new estate recovery liability. As a result, the public continued to ignore long-term care until they need it, turning to Medicaid by default if they do. Here’s our advice. First, don’t make the problem worse by eliminating estate recovery requirements. Doing so will further reduce incentives to prepare properly for long-term care expenses. It also would permit more heirs to shift costs that their parents’ estate should bear onto taxpayers. Government should provide Medicaid for the truly indigent but allowing middle and upper-income Americans to preserve a greater inheritance weakens the safety net for those who most need it and is unfair to taxpayers and those who prepare properly. Second, the government should enforce and publicize Medicaid estate recoveries. This would reduce dependency on Medicaid, preserve Medicaid for the truly needy and encourage responsible private behavior. As federal deficits and debt explode, it has never made more sense to limit welfare programs to those who are poor. Steve Moses is president of the Center for Long-Term Care Reform and author of “Medicaid and Long-Term Care” (2020). Brian Blase served as a special assistant to President Trump at the National Economic Council, 2017-19. He is president of Blase Policy Strategies LLC. |