LTC Bullet:  Don't Mess With Texans' LTC--Fix It! 

Friday, March 16, 2007 


LTC Comment:  Texas is a bellwether for what's right (good intentions and creativity) and what's wrong (counter-productive public policy) in long-term care.  Our analysis after the ***news.*** 

*** TODAY'S LTC BULLET is sponsored by Claude Thau, a Master General Agent who helps LTCi producers nationwide.  Claude is the lead author of Tillinghast Broker World Individual and Group LTCi Surveys.  His mentoring skills help you build whichever market suits you best (individuals, executive carve-out, multi-life, affinity, financial institutions, referrals from other professionals, etc.).  As a Long-Term Care Partnership-promoter in many capacities, Claude may be able to help your state implement a Partnership effectively.  Test Claude by calling 800-999-3026, x2241 to discuss opportunities or *** 

*** REFERRALS.  Thank you for reading the Center for Long-Term Care Reform's latest "LTC Bullets" newsletter.  If you know somebody who would be interested in this publication, please recommend us by clicking here   If you have received this edition as a forward, and would like your own subscription, you may subscribe here  Thank you. ***   

*** WEBINARS.  We held our first formal webinar, titled "Maximize the Value of," on February 26, 2007.  Feedback was excellent.  For example:  

"Good webinar.  Learned a lot.  Especially how to retrieve info is great!" 

"The content is mind blowing!!  Great job!!  I look forward to more of same!  Keep up the good work!!" 

"This webinar is one of the most profitable hours I have EVER spent." 

To view a recording of this webinar (available only for one more week), go to, fill in the requested registration information and click on "view archived webinar." *** 



LTC Comment:  The Center for Long-Term Care Reform's study of Medicaid and long-term care financing in Texas was published yesterday by the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) of Austin, TX. 

TPPF describes itself thus at  "The Texas Public Policy Foundation is a 501(c)3 non-profit, non-partisan research institute guided by the core principles of individual liberty, personal responsibility, private property rights, free markets and limited government.  The Foundation’s mission is to improve Texas by generating academically sound research and data on state issues, and by recommending the findings to opinion leaders, policymakers, the media and general public." 

I want to acknowledge the invaluable assistance and collaboration of Mary Katherine Stout in every aspect of the Texas project.  Ms. Stout is TPPF's Vice President of Policy and the Director of its Center for Health Care Policy Studies. 

Following is my "commentary" about LTC in Texas.  You can find it also at  To read the full report, titled "Don't Mess With Texans' LTC--Fix It," go to


"Don't Tread on Texans' Long-Term Care-Fix It! 

By Stephen A. Moses 

If the nation isn’t prepared for the aging baby boomers, it isn’t because the boomers sneaked up on us. For some time, we have seen the warnings and been conscious of the coming “age wave.” The problem is that few have taken heed and been moved to act thus far. 

While national leaders warn about the coming collapse of Medicare and Social Security, state lawmakers grow increasingly concerned about meeting the increasing demand and cost of Medicaid long-term care as the boomers age. To stave off the coming disaster, state lawmakers need to respond quickly to embrace every ounce of the limited federal flexibility available. 

Most Medicaid reformers look to how states can encourage people to plan for their long-term care through private long-term care insurance. Too often, these lawmakers think that merely educating people on the differences of Medicaid and Medicare and which pays for long-term care will be enough to reshape people’s behavior. But the truth is that it doesn’t matter whether long-term care is paid for by Medicare, Medicaid, or Santa Claus—the important thing is that somebody pays, and we know this because people are not going without this care. 

The more important thing is for federal and state officials to recognize why they have a problem with long-term care. To wit, the government's been giving it away since 1965, crowding out private financing alternatives like personal spend down, reverse mortgages and long-term care insurance. It’s no wonder most Texans don't worry about long-term care, use their home equity to pay for it, or purchase long-term care insurance against the risk, and instead end up dependent upon public assistance for long-term care as the only alternative to consuming their own wealth and their heirs' inheritances. 

The second thing is that although Medicaid, the primary payer of long-term care services in Texas, is a means-tested public assistance program, it is actually rather easy to qualify for Medicaid long-term care services. Generous eligibility guidelines and well-known and exploited loopholes make it easy for Texans with substantially higher income and assets to qualify by purchasing exempt assets with otherwise countable resources and retaining the counsel of Medicaid estate planning specialists. 

Medicaid is too often used as inheritance insurance for those who have resources that should be used to support their own long-term care. Although Medicaid was intended to be a safety net for the few who truly have no other alternatives for their long-term care needs, it now serves the poor and prosperous alike and allows people to plan for Medicaid to pay their bills. As a consequence, the program will soon feel the weight of a growing caseload among those who are already the program’s most expensive population to serve, which will threaten the safety net for the truly needy. 

What should Texas policy makers do about this? To a large degree, their hands are tied by federal laws and regulations. But to the extent that they can, they must begin to target Medicaid to the truly needy and use the savings to educate the public about long-term care and to incentivize the use of private financing alternatives. 

As a result, seniors will get better access to higher quality care across a wider spectrum of care if they pay privately, and Medicaid will be able to do a better job for a smaller number of people who truly need it. The long-term care market will respond in kind, giving people the services they demand at the best prices. Competition will reward providers richly for providing benefits that the people want, and those seeking long-term care services, whether at home or in an institutional setting, will have greater choice with better quality. 

Perhaps most importantly, people will have an interest and an opportunity to plan for their own long-term care. 

Of all the examples where government programs have crowded out private activity, the most egregious and fiscally damaging have been the impacts of Medicare and Medicaid on planning for long-term care. Our window of opportunity to set these programs back on sound footing is quickly closing and nothing short of fundamental reform will do. If we continue to deny the problem and simply kick it forward into the future, we will find that the “inheritance” we’re trying to leave for our kids may not be enough to cover the tax bill with which we’ve stuck them. 

Stephen Moses ( is president of the Center for Long-Term Care Reform in Seattle ( and a Senior Research Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation in Austin, Texas. Moses’ new report on Medicaid Long-Term Care in Texas is available through the Foundation at
Texas Public Policy Foundation
900 Congress Ave., Ste. 400
Austin, TX 78701
Phone 512.472.2700
Fax 512.472.2728