|
How to Reduce Medicaid Expenditures and Improve Long-Term Care a proposal by the Center for Long-Term Care Reform submitted to the Empire Center for New York State Policy on February 10, 2010 I. The National Problem Medicaid is a means-tested public assistance program, i.e. welfare. Yet Medicaid is the principal funding source for long-term care (LTC) throughout the United States, not only for the poor, but for most Americans. Although LTC users are only seven percent of the Medicaid population, they account for more than half of the program's costs nationally. The only way Medicaid can survive as a long-term care safety net for the poor is if more prosperous people plan responsibly and pay privately for their own long-term care. But Medicaid crowds out most private LTC financing alternatives such as home equity conversion and insurance. The trend toward greater and greater dependency on welfare-financed nursing home care is reversible. It will be reversed by responsible public policy or by default as costs skyrocket and public resources dwindle with the aging of the baby boom. II. The State Problem New York spent $41,397,000,000 on Medicaid in 2007 of which $9,480,000,000 or 23% were LTC expenditures for older people and adults with physical disabilities, an increase of 7% since 2002. New York's age 85 plus population, the cohort most likely to require LTC, was 385,000 or 2.0% in 2007, but is expected to be 622,000 and 3.2% in 2030, a 62% increase. Medicaid is the primary payer for 72% of the state's nursing home residents. Another 13% rely primarily on Medicare. Medicaid and Medicare also pay for most home health care, 75% nationally. Our best estimate is that only 1%-5% of New York's 50+ citizens own LTC insurance. Very few use home equity to fund LTC. Thus, financing Medicaid LTC is a large and growing strain on New York's budget. Private LTC financing is minimal and shows few signs of increasing. Demographic and fiscal pressures will exacerbate these problems. Yet federal law and regulations inhibit some effective corrective actions New York might take--such as tightening loose eligibility rules--and encourage other initiatives--such as "rebalancing" from institutional to home care--which may increase utilization and costs. III. Substantive Proposal New York can reduce its annual Medicaid budget by an amount equal to 10% of current nursing home expenditures for aged and disabled recipients or $675,000,000 per year within five years. We propose to conduct a study of LTC financing in New York that shows why such savings are possible and how to achieve them while improving access to quality LTC for everyone in the state. Toward that end, we will . . .
We propose to work with a representative of the Empire Center for New York State Policy and/or the New York Medicaid agency to identify interviewees and schedule appointments. We will visit New York for one week to conduct the onsite research and interviews. We will conduct other necessary research online. IV. Business Proposal Deliverables, within six weeks of project approval, will include (1) a comprehensive report (approx. 25 pages) that explains the problem of LTC financing and recommends solutions to achieve savings of at least $675,000,000 per annum; (2) one or more newspaper op-eds, and (3) an article suitable for publication in the Empire Center for New York State Policy's journal. Stephen Moses (professional bio attached) will conduct all of the research and interviews for this project. He has conducted many similar studies over the years. Examples of his project reports are at http://www.centerltc.com/reports.htm. Respectfully submitted February 10, 2010 Stephen A. Moses
2212
Queen Anne Avenue North, #110, Seattle, Washington 98109 ~ Phone (206) 283-7036
~ Fax (206) 283-6536 Email info@centerltc.com ~ Ask how you can support the Center today! ~ Subscribe to LTC Bullets WEBSITE: WWW.CENTERLTC.COM |