LTC Bullet: Bridging LTC Silos

Friday, May 1, 2026

Seattle—

LTC Comment: LTC providers and insurers communicate too little, hewing jealously to their professional bailiwicks. We try to narrow the gap after the ***news.*** 

*** LTC CLIPPINGS:  Did you catch these stories this week?  Our LTC Clippings subscribers received them in real time including Steve Moses’s always trenchant, often ironic, sometimes humorous, usually concise “LTC Comments.”  To subscribe or for a free trial, contact Damon at 206-283-7036 or damon@centerltc.com. Examples below:

4/28/2026, “New Law Caps Home Equity for Medicaid Long-Term Care,” by Lee Pruitt, ElderLawAnswers

Quote: “A new federal law, effective in 2028, will cap the amount of home equity a person can have and still qualify for Medicaid long-term care at $1 million. This $1 million limit will not increase with inflation, meaning more homeowners will be affected over time as property values rise. If your home equity is near or above $1 million, consult an elder law attorney now to explore options like reverse mortgages or legal transfers before the 2028 deadline.”

LTC Comment: Good advertising hook for Medicaid planners, huh? An open invitation to ignore private LTC insurance and rely on taxpayers to protect home equity from LTC risk. What’s even worse, the same Medicaid planners will tell people with less home equity and a lot of cash to convert the countable cash to exempt status by added spending on the home. After they pay the attorney’s fee first, which is also exempt. Just another example of “What’s Worse than Medicaid Fraud.”

----------------------

4/27/2026, “Medicaid Waste, Fraud, and Abuse: Why CMS’s Improper Payment Rate Can’t Be Trusted,” by Chris Medrano and Brian Blase, Paragon Health Institute

Quote: “Medicaid’s improper payment rate is widely misunderstood. PERM provides a narrow compliance estimate and is not a reliable measure of waste, fraud, abuse, or total improper payments in Medicaid. Major gaps in eligibility determinations and managed care payments make PERM incomplete. The program does not fully capture eligibility errors and fails to examine managed care payments at the provider level—despite managed care representing the majority of Medicaid spending. Low reported error rates risk creating a false sense of security. Because PERM relies on limited samples and lagged data, its findings understate risks and the scale of improper payments. Policymakers should strengthen PERM to improve accountability and enable enforcement actions in Medicaid.”

LTC Comment: Bottom line: no one knows how much fraud, waste and abuse permeate Medicaid because such limited measurements as exist are fatally flawed. How refreshing that this critical subject is finally getting the attention it deserves. ***

 

LTC BULLET: BRIDGING LTC SILOS

LTC Comment: Have you noticed how little the people and companies responsible for providing long-term care (LTC) communicate with the people and companies responsible for funding LTC?  You would think these two industries should have much to discuss. Nursing homes and home health agencies desperately need revenue. LTC insurers struggle to attract buyers. But the two professions rarely work together.

Both face a common problem. Medicaid pays LTC providers too little, often less than the cost of providing the care. Easy access to Medicaid when care is needed crowds out demand for private LTC insurance. Logically, LTC providers and insurers would unite and mobilize to advocate for policies that target Medicaid benefits to the neediest Americans and divert the well-to-do toward private financing, so that they pay economically sustainable market rates.

The Center for Long-Term Care Reform has published dozens of national and state-level studies proposing policy solutions along those lines. Most recently, “Long-Term Care: The Problem” and “Long-Term Care: The Solution” with the Paragon Health Institute. At the same time, we have placed articles and columns in trade journals and other publications intended to link the interests of LTC providers and insurers. Following are some examples from October 2021 through April 2024. We hope you’ll open and read some of them and that they will help tie together the interests and policies of LTC providers and insurers.

  1. The Medicaid LTC snafu,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnights LTC News, April 15, 2024 (PDF version.) This article shows how Medicaid’s generous eligibility rules allow people with significant income and assets to use Medicaid’s scarce resources.
  2. Setting the Record Straight on Long-Term Care Policy,” by Stephen A. Moses and Brian Blase, Townhall, April 14, 2024 (PDF version.) This article debunks the claim, presented in The New York Times’ recent series Dying Broke, that catastrophic long-term care expenses are wiping out the savings of American middle-class families.
  3. How government prevaricates about long-term care,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnights LTC News, February 23, 2024 (PDF version.) This article explores the biases in how federal officials and the media report long-term care expenditures. It deconstructs the conventional wisdom about out-of-pocket spending data. 
  4. Government must encourage personal responsibility, prohibit easy access to Medicaid,” by Steve Moses and Brian Blase, Washington Times, November 30, 2023. (PDF version.) Save Medicaid LTC for the needy by engaging self-interest and personal responsibility.
  5. The federal Medicaid bait and switch,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s LTC News, November 6, 2023. (PDF version.) Medicaid promised LTC providers generous revenue but reneged creating shortfalls that hurt providers and consumers.
  6. "What’s Wrong With Long-Term Care?," by Stephen A. Moses, RealClear Policy, November 2, 2022. (PDF version.) This article is a succinct explanation of what’s wrong with our long-term care system and how to fix it.
  7. LTC insurance sales suddenly surge,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s LTC News, August 10, 2022. (PDF version.) It took Washington State’s public long-term care insurance program to excite private LTC insurance demand in that state to unbelievable levels. This article explores this curious phenomenon and its important public policy implications.
  8. Long-term care’s mortal risk,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s LTC News, June 6, 2022. (PDF version.) What if our long-term care system collapses? This article explores how feeble our long-term care system actually is.
  9. Long-Term Care Epiphany,” by Stephen A. Moses, Broker World, June 2022. (PDF version.) What if the so-called “long-term care crisis” was really “no biggie”? This article reconceptualizes the LTC conundrum and provides a solution.
  10. Trappings of LTC system leave operators trapped,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s Long-Term Care News, February 23, 2022. (PDF version.) This article is a “thought experiment” exploring how a true free market can vastly improve our long-term care system.
  11. The Great Long-Term Care Compromise,” by Stephen A. Moses, Broker World, January 1, 2022. (PDF version.) Using Washington State’s WA Cares as a model, this article shows how to solve the long-term care crisis by mandating people to choose between social or private LTC insurance.
  12. The irony of long-term care advocacy,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s Long-Term Care News, December 17, 2021. (PDF version.) This article examines the disconnect between the long-term care people want and the long-term care public policy they get.
  13. Long Term Care Irony,” by Stephen A. Moses, Broker World, December 1, 2021. (PDF version.) When forced to choose between public and private options for long-term care, Washington State saw an unprecedented influx of private LTCi applications. This article examines the historical context and primary LTC myth driving such consumer behavior.  
  14. What works for long-term care and what doesn’t,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s LTC News, November 17, 2021. (PDF version.)
    This article gives a historical perspective of what’s gone wrong with public financing of long-term care and how private financing can improve it.
  15. What’s better for senior living and care — the market or government?,” by Stephen A. Moses, McKnight’s Senior Living, October 25, 2021. (PDF version.)
    This article explains why and how markets succeed while government usually fails.