LTC Bullet: LTC Culture Shock
August 28, 2007
Comment: LTC providers and
insurers occupy two very different economic worlds.
When they visit each other, culture shock often occurs.
One example after the ***news.***
IT'S NOT TOO LATE to join us for tomorrow morning's free 30-minute
Webinar with Steve Moses. Get
the details and register at https://www.gotomeeting.com/register/669770207.
The program begins at 9AM Pacific, 10AM Mountain, 11AM Central or
12 noon Eastern. ***
TO LTC CONNECTION (www.ltcconnection.com)
for donating the software that allows us to bring you special programs
like tomorrow's Webinar. Watch
for much more in the months ahead including Webinar presentations of the
Center's highly regarded "LTC Graduate Seminar" and in-depth
coverage of our National Long-Term Care Consciousness Tour, the latter
reserved for "LTC Gadflies" and "Regional
Representatives" of the Center.
Watch "LTC Bullets" in the next two weeks for details
on these new programs and opportunities. ***
*** JOIN THE CENTER AND ENTER "THE ZONE"
WITHOUT THE $150 FEE UP-FRONT. Did
you know you can now donate as little as $12.50 per month (automatically
on your credit card) and qualify immediately for the Center for
Long-Term Care Reform's members-only web zone (including the
"Almanac of Long-Term Care") AND for our one-a-day mental
vitamins ("LTC Bullets" and "LTC E-Alerts")?
Please make a new or supplemental contribution now at http://www.centerltc.com/support/index.htm
. Don't feel limited to the
minimum if you can afford and feel moved to contribute more. Your support is much needed and greatly appreciated.
Please direct any questions regarding our members-only website,
AKA "The Zone," or donating online or by check to email@example.com
or call us at 206-283-7036. ***
BULLET: LTC CULTURE SHOCK
Comment: There is a vast
gulf of misunderstanding and distrust between LTC providers and insurers
in the United States. Providers
think insurers should cover everything.
"After all, what good is insurance if you can't buy it when
you have Alzheimer's Disease?"
Insurers think providers are just looking for a funder with
deeper pockets than Medicaid. "Don't
they know we have to underwrite, price actuarially, and invest reserves,
unlike government?" Consequently,
there has been very little successful cooperation between LTC providers
studied this problem and reported on it in a paper titled "The LTC
Triathlon: Long-Term Care's
Race for Survival." Read
it at http://www.centerltc.com/pubs/triathlon.pdf.
a nutshell, Medicaid made nursing home a free (or heavily subsidized)
good in 1965. That was the
origin of institutional bias. With
nursing home care funded by government, people were discouraged from
paying privately for home- and community-based services (HCBS).
So an HCBS infrastructure didn't develop. Nor did private insurance to pay for LTC get market traction.
Why insure for a financial risk that didn't exist?
But as Medicaid-financed nursing home care lost favor with the
public, private HCBS, assisted living, and insurance to pay for them got
a foothold. Nevertheless,
Medicaid and Medicare remain the overpoweringly dominant funders of
long-term care, so LTC providers have put most of their lobbying efforts
into a fruitless fight for more public funding.
Simultaneously, they've been disappointed by the private
insurance that has been available because of the coverage and payment
deficiencies of older policies.
about to change this whole dynamic is the gradual implosion of publicly
financed LTC over the next two or three decades. In a very few years, LTC providers will have to depend much
more heavily on private financing.
LTC insurers (and reverse mortgage lenders) will find their
products far more in demand. At
that point, providers, insurers and lenders will collaborate, understand
each other's challenges and needs, and adapt successfully.
But why wait for the crisis?
The time to start this process is now.
There is a lot of good to be done and a lot of money to be made
for open-minded providers and insurers who get in front of the Age Wave
and ride it. Others will be
capsized financially by it.
Center for Long-Term Care Reform staff had the following exchange with
the representative of a successful Continuing Care Retirement Community
who is a long-time supporter of the Center.
He's desperately trying to improve long-term care and reaching
out to insurers for help. We
want to encourage this kind of conversation and hope it leads to closer
collaboration between these two critical sides of the long-term care
interlocutor in this exchange asked to remain anonymous.
appreciate your assistance in our efforts to get LTC insurance companies
to recognize our model of care and permit coverage of the nursing care
we provide under our LTC license. Some
time ago we decided to drop our nursing home license and combine
assisted living and nursing home levels into a new modality of care. We provide now essentially the same levels of care as offered
under our old model of assisted living and nursing home care, except
Medicare skilled nursing care.
goals in establishing this new model were threefold:
Eliminate the need for residents to move from assisted living to a
nursing home setting thus reducing the stress to fragile elders as their
health declines. So far in
the first year of operating this model we have avoided moves from one
level to another for over 15% of our residents.
Families report high levels of satisfaction as we bring the care
directly to the resident.
Reduce the overall cost of care by providing essentially the same levels
of nursing and personal care as in a nursing home in a less restrictive,
lower cost setting. We have
demonstrated a notable reduction in care costs during the past year.
Change the culture of care through a neighborhood, homelike care setting
to improve the quality of life and the dignity of living.
problem we are encountering is insurance companies that do not
specifically include assisted living in their policy coverage, typically
a problem in policies written 12-15 years ago.
While we can demonstrate that we are providing care at the level
equivalent to a nursing care center (our staffing levels, for example,
are essentially the same as we had when operating a licensed nursing
home), our residents have usually been denied coverage on the technical
point that assisted living is not referenced in the policy.
have assisted residents/families in appealing their denials by insurance
companies but to date have rarely succeeded in getting the companies to
understand that we are actually providing a less costly service for
their beneficiaries. In a
case just denied recently, a couple has been denied coverage on the very
point that assisted living is not specifically stated as a service
covered in their policy. When
we were providing the exact same care under our nursing home licensed
program a couple years ago, coverage was approved by the company.
you have any experience working with this problem?
Any strategy you could suggest to make our case more effectively
in the face of companies that seem to be motivated exclusively with
protecting their premium dollars?
a long time member of the Center for Long Term Care Reform, I hope we
can make progress on this issue which affects more and more facilities
like ours who are trying to provide the most cost-effective care for our
LTC Provider member of the Center for Long-Term Care Reform
heart goes out to you and your residents.
And to myself! I've
paid for my mother's LTC insurance policy for 20 years.
It is nursing-home only and requires a three-day hospitalization.
It was state-of-the-art in 1987.
My own policy, purchased in 1996, covers lifetime assisted living
and nursing home care, so no problem there.
Both policies are with Genworth, an industry leader, for whose
predecessor I worked at the time.
it is unrealistic to expect insurance companies to pay for a benefit
that didn't exist when they priced their products.
It would be unfair to policy holders too. Paying for assisted living on nursing-home-only policies
would deplete reserves and force premium increases for everyone.
programs can promise everybody everything and then deliver whatever
taxpayers will bear, at least until the public financing system
implodes, which it will in time. Private
insurance companies don't have the same luxury.
They are held to contracts enforceable in a court of law. They cannot arbitrarily decide to expand benefits and then
raise premiums or reduce benefits like government, with a vote and
stroke of a pen.
I have little influence with the LTCi carriers.
Few of them support the Center.
And even fewer providers do.
Why? Our mission is
to preserve Medicaid as a safety net for the poor and to improve care
for everyone by reducing dependency on low Medicaid reimbursements. It just happens that the only way to do that is to get more
people insured or using their home equity for their LTC.
There is not enough support for that mission even from the people
and companies who would benefit most.
for your response. I
appreciate the work of the CLTCR and will continue to support you with
my membership renewal.
do want to challenge one assumption you are making.
In the case of our program we are providing nursing home
equivalent care in a licensed assisted living setting.
In almost every case we are able to sustain all residents in
assisted living except those who require Medicare skilled care post
hospitalization. The care is not only equal to the nursing benefit it is
better because it is more home-like and thereby more satisfying to the
resident and it's also less expensive.
residents with LTC insurance policies, especially the ones with
unlimited benefits could cost the insurance company more in the end by
having to go to a nursing home for care.
Many CCRC's are transferring their memory support/dementia care
from their nursing home setting to their assisted living facility so
this is a growing issue for our elder care industry.
We believe we can demonstrate that our care levels justify the
coverage and are more cost effective for insurance companies.
Insurance companies do have the ability to interpret their
policies in such a way that they would not be taking on an additional
liability. This would be the case for our program participants, not for
others who cannot demonstrate the nursing home equivalency.
In my opinion, it is unfair to all policy holders not to do so.
me, I hear you. My own
mother lives in an assisted living facility which seems to have a very
similar arrangement for "aging in place."
Just this morning I received her latest assessment which will
raise her care level and the monthly charge.
At some point in the future, the care level may reach
nursing-home equivalency. It
certainly seems that at that point, it would be appropriate for her
nursing-home only LTCi policy to pay.
But it won't. Nevertheless, we'll keep her in assisted living as long as we
can, because of the many amenities.
Our proclivity (and others') to do that is cost avoidance for the
LTC insurance industry, without which it could not hang on by its
financial fingertips as it does now.
often make the analogy between the bitter experience of private
insurance over the past 15 years and what is about to happen to
Medicaid. When LTCi was
nursing home insurance, no one wanted to file a claim.
Who wants to go to a nursing home?
After it became comprehensive coverage, everyone wanted to claim. That's not the only or even the biggest reason, but it is an
important part of why premiums have increased, sales have declined, and
no one is making much money in the LTC business (except Medicaid
planners.) Now that
Medicaid is moving toward HCBS to save money, the same thing will
happen. Demand will
increase, costs will inflate, caps on slots and reimbursement will
worsen and the market for private financing alternatives will decline
even faster. The whole system is in a world of hurt.
insurance industry can't save the day unless and until government gets
out of the way. That's
where the institutional bias comes from:
free nursing home care from Medicaid for 40 years.
It's just wrong to blame private insurance which is light years
ahead of Medicaid in adapting to consumer preferences.
Indeed, only the old policies--that mirrored Medicaid and
Medicare coverage and triggers--remain problematical.
and Finkelstein [search at www.nber.org
for their papers] show Medicaid crowds out two-thirds to 90 percent of
the LTCi market. How can we
expect the LTCi coverage, tiny by comparison to public coverage, to
solve the problem public policy caused?
As it stands, LTCi insurers can only survive by enforcing policy
language and depending on the public's aversion to nursing home care to
keep claims within reasonable bounds.
again for your thoughtful inquiry.
I wish I could be more helpful, but this whole problem has become
intractable and is probably headed toward total collapse in the next
twenty years just as I've predicted for past two decades.