LTC Bullet: Surplus Won't Save Us
Wednesday March 14, 2001
Seattle—
In testimony before the U.S. Senate Budget Committee last month, David Walker,
Comptroller General of the United States, delivered a sobering message about
our national budget surplus and the future of federal retirement security and
health programs, including Medicaid.
His message: Don't be fooled by the surplus, however large and however
much we save of it. We're still on
course for a fiscal train wreck absent serious entitlement reform. To this end,
the Center for LTC
Financing's offers it's "LTC Choice" proposal to reform long-term
care so at least the Medicaid program can survive to provide high quality care
to the truly needy long into the future.
The Center's policy paper, "LTC Choice: A Simple, Cost-Free Solution to the Long-Term Care Financing
Puzzle" is available in .pdf format at http://www.centerltc.org/pubs/CLTCF%20Report. You can also order a hard
copy of the paper [$24.95; free to media and lawmakers] by sending your request
and complete contact information to info@centerltc.org.
Below are excerpts from Comptroller General Walker's compelling testimony:
"Our [GAO's] long-term simulations . . . show that spending for federal
health and retirement programs eventually overwhelms even today's projected
surpluses. This is true even assuming
no additional spending for defense, education, or a Medicare prescription
benefit—i.e., even if the entire unified surplus was saved." (p. 3)
* * *
"Although the ten-year horizon looks better in CBO's [Congressional Budget
Office's] January 31st projections than it did in July 2000, the long-term
fiscal outlook looks worse. In the longer
term--beyond the 10-year budget window of CBO's projections—the share of the
population over 65 will begin to climb and the federal budget will increasingly
be driven by demographic trends.
"As more and more of the baby boom generation enters retirement, spending
for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will demand correspondingly larger
shares of federal revenues. Federal
health and retirement spending will also surge due to improvements in
longevity. People are likely to live
longer than they did in the past, and spend more time in retirement. Finally, advances in medical technology are
likely to keep pushing up the cost of providing health care."
(pps. 5-6)
* * *
"The message from our long-term simulations, which incorporate CBO's
10-year estimates, remains the same as it was a year ago. Indeed, it is the same as when we first
published long-term simulations in 1992.
Even if all projected unified surpluses are saved and used for debt
reduction, deficits reappear in 2042.
If only the Social Security surpluses are saved, unified deficits emerge
in 2019. . . . In both scenarios
deficits would eventually grow to unsustainable levels absent policy changes.
"To move into a future with no changes in federal health and retirement
programs is to envision a very different role for the federal government. Assuming, for example, that Congress and the
President adhere to the often-stated goal of saving the Social Security
surpluses our long-term model shows a world by 2030 in which Social Security,
Medicare, and Medicaid increasingly absorb available revenues within the
federal budget. Under this scenario,
these programs would require more than three-quarters of total federal revenue.
"Little room would be left for other federal spending priorities such as
national defense, education, and law enforcement. Absent changes in the structure of Social Security and Medicare,
some time during the 2040s government would do nothing but mail checks to the
elderly and their healthcare providers.
Accordingly, substantive reform of Social Security and health programs
remains critical to recapturing our future fiscal flexibility." (pps.
8-10)
* * *
"As we have stated elsewhere, early action to change these programs would
yield the highest fiscal dividends for the federal budget and would provide a
longer period for prospective beneficiaries to make adjustments in the own
planning. This message is not changed
by the new surplus numbers. It remains
true that the longer we wait to take action on the programs driving long-term
deficits, the more painful and difficult the choices will become." (p. 20)
Source: "Long-Term Budget Issues: Moving From Balancing the Budget to
Balancing Fiscal Risk," Testimony before the Committee on the Budget, U.S.
Senate, Statement of David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States,
February 6, 2001, GAO-01-385T,
www.gao.gov.
_____________
*** Forward freely; encourage subscribers! ***
The Center for Long-Term Care Financing is a 501(c)(3) charitable non-profit
organization dedicated to ensuring quality long-term care for all
Americans. Ask how you can support the
Center today! Visit our website at http://www.centerltc.org/needhelp.htm
or contact Amy Marohn at amy@centerltc.org
for details.
This e-mail is the latest installment of "LTC Bullets" - the Center's
periodic online news service covering the latest information and trends in
long-term care financing. We welcome
responses to the material presented.
***Unsubscribe by simply using your reply button to send a request. Please put your e-mail address and name in
the body of your message. Your e-mail
address will be deleted from the Center's mailing list before our next
mailing. We apologize for any
inconvenience. We do not intend our
"LTC Bullets" to reach anyone not interested in receiving them.***
All past issues of LTC Bullets may be read on the Center's web site at www.centerltc.org
Please direct any questions or requests to info@centerltc.org
Thank you for your time and interest.
Center for Long-Term Care Financing
11418 NE 19th Street
Bellevue, WA 98004
Ph: 425-467-6840
Fax: 425-467-6829
E-mail: info@centerltc.org
Web: www.centerltc.org